Amazon’s retail transformation has made Jeff Bezos the world’s wealthiest person. Google and Facebook dominate the Internet. Apple devices are as ubiquitous as Microsoft software. As New York Times columnist Tom Friedman told our Wharton Global Forum in Hong Kong in June, the last decade has been truly revolutionary.Just look at the 2007 versus 2017 data on the world’s largest public companies (updated by Wikipedia at the end of Q2 2017). A decade ago, Microsoft was the only tech company in the top 10.


Top companies in the world by market capitalization, Q2 2007 (Wikipedia)


As of Q2 2017, Microsoft was still sitting at number three. But it had been joined in the global top 10 by Alphabet (the Google parent company), Apple, Amazon, and Facebook. Now half of the biggest 10 companies in the world are American tech titans.

But there are actually seven tech firms in the global top 10 now—the other two are Chinese: Alibaba and Tencent. In China, everyone knows “BAT” (Baidu, the Chinese Google, along with Alibaba and Tencent). There is much less BAT buzz outside China, for two reasons.

First, the Chinese government’s “great firewall” around the Internet not only restricts the flow of information in China, but also helps protect Chinese firms from international competition. Second, the Chinese tech companies have tended to be rapid adopters and adapters of innovations generated elsewhere, rather than breakthrough inventors themselves.


Top companies in the world by market capitalization, Q1 & Q2 2017 (Wikipedia)


The first point continues to hold: “techno-nationalism” is a new term of concern in the West. China aspires to chart its own course to global prominence in technology by protecting the domestic market and always keeping a close eye on the IP of others.

But the second reason for discounting Chinese tech—that it is incapable of creating true innovation —is rapidly receding as a viable criticism. Anyone who ignores Alibaba and Tencent does so at their own peril, because of real innovations those companies are implementing in China, and what they hope to do globally tomorrow.

I am not thinking of the fact that more goods move through Alibaba’s platforms than Amazon’s—even though that’s the case (in terms of their value). It’s also true that Tencent’s WeChat is Facebook, FaceTime, and LinkedIn all rolled into one. But both facts probably have more to do with the scale of the Chinese market and the distinctive habits of Chinese people than Chinese innovation.

Rather, I am most struck by China’s massive lead (literally 50 times the U.S.) in the world of mobile payments. In the next decade, most people expect dynamic, if not revolutionary, movement towards a cash-free society across the world. The title of the graph below from the Financial Times says it all.



When it comes to Alibaba, think less “eBay meets Walmart and Amazon,” and more fintech. For Tencent, think less social media and e-sports, and more fintech.

469 million people made online payments in China in 2016. An even greater number used phones to make purchases in offline retail stores. (For comparison, the American user base of Apple Pay, by far the dominant American player, was just 12 million last year.) Today, I am used to seeing people in China paying for everything from taxis and coffee to clothes and meals with either WeChat (Weixin) Pay or Alipay (Zhifubao)—another world from the China of the early 2000s when you had to pay hotel bills with a series of 100 RMB notes.

This new world was brought home to me at a breakfast I attended a few months ago in Shanghai. It was the birthday of someone at the table. To celebrate, someone wanted to send “red packets” (hongbao) to everyone at the breakfast. This is an age-old Chinese tradition—stuffing different amounts of cash into red envelopes to celebrate a special occasion, with the surprise of seeing what you got.

Of course, there were no physical red packets on the breakfast table. There were just a lot of smartphones, all with the red packets app on WeChat. Apparently, my breakfast companions were not alone. Last Chinese New Year, 14 billion digital red packets were gifted through WeChat—10 packets for every one of the 1.4 billion people living in China.

And then someone at the table turned the red packet into gold—by using their red packet bounty to buy gold (probably no more than .01 of an ounce), on another WeChat app. I really don’t know how the gold transaction worked, but if there is a way to trade gold on your phone in the U.S., I certainly haven’t been able to find it.

Then there is the rise of quasi-banking in China—all based on the fact that people deposit money on their phones to pay for stuff. Here the leader is Alibaba’s Yu’e Bao (“leftover treasure”), a money market fund with 370 million account holders and $211 billion in assets, with 100 percent growth in the past year. It is now the largest money market fund in the world, according to Morningstar. By contrast, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, a bank founded in 1895, is number two.

If China is the present when it comes to mobile payments, India may be the future. Consider two recent developments in India.

First, India is today’s global leader in biometric digital IDs. The “Aadhaar” initiative was launched in 2009. Today 1.17 billion Indians (99 percent of the population over age 18) have a digital ID—complete with a WR code that acts like a super U.S. Social Security number, as well as a digital photo, a retina scan, and 10 digital fingerprints.

Second, last year the Indian government undertook an unprecedented “demonetization”— with no warning, taking out of circulation all at once and the 500 and 1000 rupee (under $10 and $20) bank notes, estimated to represent 86 percent of the country’s total currency.

Both Aadhaar (for privacy concerns) and demonetization (for slowing down the Indian economy) have been subject to trenchant criticism. But put together, they will turn India into a digital payments gold rush within the next few years.

All the big global players are already there—including both America and China—with some serious Indian players too.

No one knows who will win this global competition, but the recent history of digital payments underlines a key fact. The extraordinary innovativeness of the U.S. tech sector is justly acclaimed. However, it is no longer immune to the forces of globalization and global competition that have disrupted so many other industries in the past few decades.


Editor’s note: This post was originally published on Dean Geoffrey Garrett’s LinkedIn page, where he was named an “influencer” for his insights in the business world. Geoffrey Garrett is Dean, Reliance Professor of Management and Private Enterprise, and Professor of Management at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Follow Geoff on Twitter. View the original post here.